MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135902442 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00126-1

Estimating disease burden attributable to household air pollution: new methods within the Global Burden of Disease Study

2021· article· en· W3135902442 on OpenAlex
Fiona B Bennitt, Sarah S Wozniak, Kate Causey, Katrin Burkart, Michael Bräuer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental healthAttributable riskDisease burdenMedicinePopulationAir pollutionDisability-adjusted life yearRelative riskBurden of diseaseEnvironmental scienceConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundDespite a substantial reduction in the use of solid fuels worldwide, exposure to household air pollution (HAP) from use of these fuels for cooking remains a leading risk factor for global disease burden. Among environmental risk factors, the contribution of HAP to disease burden is second only to ambient particulate matter pollution. We present updates to our modeling methodology as well as our latest findings on attributable burden estimates.MethodsWe estimated HAP-attributable burden for cataract, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischaemic heart disease, lower respiratory infections, lung cancer, neonatal disorders, stroke, and type 2 diabetes for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. We used spatio-temporal Gaussian Process Regression to model data from observational surveys and censuses reporting primary cooking fuel to estimate the proportion of individuals using a specific solid-fuel type (wood, coal/charcoal, agricultural residues, or dung) by location. We converted the fuel exposure estimates to year, location, and sex/age-specific PM2·5 exposures with a regression mapping function using household air pollution measurements. Using a Bayesian meta-regression tool, we estimated relative risk as a function of PM2·5 exposure for each disease based upon a systematic review of the epidemiological literature on indoor and ambient air pollution. We then combined our exposure estimates and relative risks to estimate population attributable fractions and attributable burden for each cause.FindingsIn 2019, 91·5 million global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (95% uncertainty interval 67·0–119) were attributable to HAP, a decline of more than 50% from 1990. We estimated 2·31 million (1·63–3·12) global deaths were attributable to HAP and accounted for over 4% of all deaths in 2019. HAP-attributable burden remains highest in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, with 3770·3 (2876·4–4720·2) and 2068·0 (1412·5–2799·7) age-standardised DALYs per 100 000 population, respectively.InterpretationAlthough the disease burden attributable to HAP decreased considerably between 1990 and 2019, it remains a significant risk factor. Our internally consistent methodology and comprehensive approach to estimation of HAP-attributable burden provides a robust resource for global health interventions. Efforts to transition to cleaner household energy sources should be accelerated.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it