Let's Go There: Voice and Pointing Together in VR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hand-tracking has been advertised as a natural means to engage with a virtual environment that also enhances the feeling of presence in and lowers the barriers to entry to virtual reality. We seek to explore combining hand-tracking with voice input (which is then processed with automatic speech recognition) for a novel multimodal experience. Thus, we created Let's Go There, which explores this joint-input method for four functions in virtual reality environments: positioning, object identification, information mapping, and disambiguation. This combination may serve as a more intuitive means for users to communicate and navigate in virtual environments. We expect there to be multiple potential applications of this multimodal form of interaction across numerous domains including training, education, teamwork, and games. Let's Go There, the system described in this paper, was first accepted at CUI 2020, however we also believe there is value in showcasing it at MobileHCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it