MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135953227 · doi:10.1088/1361-6668/abf985

Concepts of static vs. dynamic current transfer length in 2G HTS coated conductors with a current flow diverter architecture

2021· article· en· W3135953227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSuperconductor Science and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorConductorCTL*Current (fluid)Finite element methodMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper uses both experimental and numerical approaches to revisit the concept of current transfer length (CTL) in second-generation high-temperature superconductor coated conductors with a current flow diverter (CFD) architecture. The CFD architecture has been implemented on eight commercial coated conductor samples from THEVA. In order to measure the 2D current distribution in the silver stabilizer layer of the samples, we first used a custom-made array of 120 voltage taps to measure the surface potential distribution. Then, the so-called ‘static’ CTL ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) was extracted using a semi-analytical model that fitted well the experimental data. As defined in this paper, the static CTL on a 2D domain is a generalization of the definition commonly used in literature. In addition, we used a 3D finite element model to simulate the normal zone (NZ) propagation in our CFD samples, in order to quantify their ‘dynamic’ CTL ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), a new concept introduced in this paper and defined as the CTL observed during the propagation of a quenched region. The results show that, for a CFD architecture, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is always larger than <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , whereas <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> when the interfacial resistance between the stabilizer and the superconductor layers is the same everywhere. We proved that the cause of these different behaviors is related to the shape of the NZ, which is curved for the CFD architecture, and rectangular otherwise. Finally, we showed that the normal zone propagation velocity (NZPV) is proportional to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , not with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , which suggests that the dynamic CTL <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is the most general definition of the CTL and should always be used when current crowding and non-uniform heat generation occurs around a NZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it