La fidélité d’implantation : un facteur de l’efficacité des formations parentales en trouble du spectre de l’autisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ABC du comportement d’enfants ayant un TSA : des parents en action ! est un programme s’adressant aux parents d’enfants ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme. Malgré les effets positifs documentés, ce programme, tout comme un bon nombre de programmes rencontre des défis lors de son application en contexte d’intervention. Cet article s’intéresse à la fidélité d’implantation de ce programme au Québec. Un total de 17 animatrices et 52 parents ont participé à la recherche. Les résultats tendent à démontrer la fidélité d’implantation du programme et permettent d’identifier des conditions facilitant et freinant sa mise en place. Ces résultats sont susceptibles d’intéresser les établissements désireux d’implanter des nouvelles interventions. Ceux-ci devant être au fait de l’importance de procéder à une évaluation rigoureuse de la fidélité d’implantation d’un programme avant même de penser à ses retombées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".