MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136006002 · doi:10.18280/rcma.310103

Macro-Scale Numerical Simulation of Moisture Transmission in Zeoli-Based Moisture Conditioning Material

2021· article· en· W3136006002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bo Zhou, Congyang Zou, Erlin Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPorous mediumMaterials scienceMoistureTortuosityPorosityDiffusionWater vaporMicroporous materialComposite materialAnisotropyChemical engineeringThermodynamicsChemistryOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By random growth method, this paper constructs isotropic porous media, anisotropic-1 porous media, and anisotropic-2 porous media, which have the same porosity but different micropore morphologies, and explores how the pore morphology affects the water vapor diffusion in the pores of porous media. The results show that: the random growth method can effectively reconstruct various porous moisture conditioning materials, and control their porosity and pore morphology; the equilibrium water vapor concentration and stabilization time of water vapor diffusion can effectively demonstrate the pore connectivity of porous media and the dynamic migration features of materials in the pores; the greater the change in the equilibrium water vapor concentration, the faster the stabilization of water vapor diffusion, and the better the pore connectivity of porous media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207