MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136013098 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p744

Abstract P744: Gene Transcript Clusters Distinguish Time-Dependent Expression Patterns in Monocytes, Neutrophils and Whole Blood After Ischemic Stroke Injury

2021· article· en· W3136013098 on OpenAlexaff
Paulina Carmona-Mora, Glen C. Jickling, Xinhua Zhan, Marisa Hakoupian, Heather Hull, Noor Alomar, Hajar Amini, Bodie Knepp, Frank R. Sharp, Boryana Stamova, Bradley P. Ander

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranscriptomeStroke (engine)Gene expressionGeneFold changeImmune systemWhole bloodPeripheral bloodImmunologyIschemic strokePathologyIschemiaInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: After ischemic stroke (IS), peripheral leukocytes infiltrate the damaged region and modulate the response to injury. We previously showed that peripheral blood cells display different gene expression profiles after IS and these transcriptional programs reflect the changes in immune processes in response to IS. Dissecting the temporal dynamics of gene expression after IS improves our understanding of the changes of molecular and cellular pathways involved in acute brain injury. Methods: We analyzed the transcriptomic profiles of 33 IS patients in isolated monocytes, neutrophils and whole blood. RNA-sequencing was performed on all the stroke samples as well as 12 controls with vascular risk factors (diabetes and/or hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia). To identify differentially expressed genes, subjects were split into time points (TPs) from stroke onset (TP1= 0-24 h; TP2= 24-48 h; and TP3= > 48 h), and controls were assigned TP0. A linear regression model including time and the interaction of diagnosis x TP with cutoff of p<0.02 and fold-change>|1.2| was used. Time dependent changes were analyzed using artificial neural networks to identify clusters of genes that behave in a similar way across TPs. Results: Unique patterns of temporal expression were distinguished for the three sample types. These include genes not expressed in TP0 that peak only within the first 24 h, others that peak or decrease in TP2 and TP3, and more complex patterns. Genes that peak at TP1 in monocytes and neutrophils are related to cell adhesion and leukocyte differentiation/migration, respectively. Early peaks in whole blood occur in genes related to transcriptional regulation. In monocytes, interleukin pathways are enriched across all TPs, whereas there is a trend of suppression after 24 h in neutrophils. The inflammasome pathway is enriched in the earlier TPs in neutrophils, while not enriched in monocytes until over 48 hours. Conclusion: Our analyses on gene expression dynamics and cluster patterns allow identification of key genes and pathways at different time points following ischemic injury that are valuable as IS biomarkers and may be possible treatment targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207