MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136024525 · doi:10.1201/9781003129660-5

Twitter's Big Data Analysis Using RStudio

2021· book-chapter· en· W3136024525 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Houssame Eddine Balouli, Lazhar Chine

Bibliographic record

VenueBig Data Analytics · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataComputer scienceData scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is an application of tweets analytics using the R programming language [1] and its interface Rstudio. In this work, we have used many packages such as “twitteR,” “tm,” and “wordcloud.” Two political figures – the US President Donald Trump and the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau – were chosen because they are among the most influential leaders in the last four years. This research aims to reach a big collection of tweets that talk about each one. After that, data obtained through different steps are revised. Finally, we created a cloud of words (which is a visual representation of words in which the size is proportional to the frequency of that word in a given text) for each one and analyzed them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0120.018
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.374
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.007 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBig Data AnalyticsSame topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207