Vitrification of particulated articular cartilage via calculated protocols
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Preserving viable articular cartilage is a promising approach to address the shortage of graft tissue and enable the clinical repair of articular cartilage defects in articulating joints, such as the knee, ankle, and hip. In this study, we developed two 2-step, dual-temperature, multicryoprotectant loading protocols to cryopreserve particulated articular cartilage (cubes ~1 mm 3 in size) using a mathematical approach, and we experimentally measured chondrocyte viability, metabolic activity, cell migration, and matrix productivity after implementing the designed loading protocols, vitrification, and warming. We demonstrated that porcine and human articular cartilage cubes can be successfully vitrified and rewarmed, maintaining high cell viability and excellent cellular function. The vitrified particulated articular cartilage was stored for a period of 6 months with no significant deterioration in chondrocyte viability and functionality. Our approach enables high-quality long-term storage of viable articular cartilage that can alleviate the shortage of grafts for use in clinically repairing articular cartilage defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".