Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myopia (short- or near-sightedness) is a widespread and costly eye disorder, affecting as many as 80–90% of young adults in some Asian cities [[1]Morgan I.G. French A.N. Ashby R.S. et al.The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018; 62: 134-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004Crossref PubMed Scopus (445) Google Scholar,[2]Baird P.N. Saw S.-.M. Lanca C. et al.Myopia.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020; 6: 99https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00231-4Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar]. It is a condition in which vision at a distance is blurred, so that myopic individuals (myopes) have to bring objects closer to see them clearly. Myopic vision can be corrected with prescription lenses or corneal refractive surgery, making vision clear at any distance; but this does not correct the underlying problem, excessive elongation of the eye along the visual axis, which increases the risk of more severe consequences including retinal detachment and visual impairment. Simple, safe, and effective therapies are needed, to prevent the onset and progression of unrestrained axial elongation [[1]Morgan I.G. French A.N. Ashby R.S. et al.The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018; 62: 134-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004Crossref PubMed Scopus (445) Google Scholar,[2]Baird P.N. Saw S.-.M. Lanca C. et al.Myopia.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020; 6: 99https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00231-4Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar]. Such therapies are available – as eye drops containing the drug atropine [[3]Wu P.-.C. Chuang M.-.N. Choi J. et al.Update in myopia and treatment strategy of atropine use in myopia control.Eye. 2019; 33: 3-13https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0139-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar], multifocal contact lenses [[4]Sankaridurg P., Bakaraju R.C., Naduvilath T., et al. Myopia control with novel central and peripheral plus contact lenses and extended depth of focus contact lenses: 2 year results from a randomised clinical trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2019;39(4):294–307. doi: 10.1111/opo.12621.Google Scholar], and overnight orthokeratology [[5]Yam J.C. Jiang Y. Tang S.M. et al.Low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study: a randomized, double- blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops in myopia control.Ophthalmol. 2019; 126: 113-124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.029Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar] – but none of them is completely satisfactory. Drugs might seem to be the treatment of choice, because of convenience for administering, and low risk of ocular infection or trauma. Low-dose atropine (0.01–0.05%) [[3]Wu P.-.C. Chuang M.-.N. Choi J. et al.Update in myopia and treatment strategy of atropine use in myopia control.Eye. 2019; 33: 3-13https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0139-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar] is available and used rather widely; but for myopia treatment it is strictly off-label, it is not 100% effective, and it produces undesirable side-effects. These side effects are due mainly to atropine's well-known and generally assumed action as antagonist at muscarinic cholinergic receptors; they might be eliminated by switching to non-muscarinic agents such as alpha-adrenergic agonists [[6]Carr B.J. Mihara K. Ramachandran R. et al.Myopia-inhibiting concentrations of muscarinic receptor antagonists block activation of alpha2A-adrenoceptors in vitro.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59: 2778-2791https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22562Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar]. However, discovery of such an alternative by the usual methods of drug development has largely failed. Ideally, one could select candidate drugs by testing those that are expected to target the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms. Mechanisms responsible for myopia have been investigated in animal models: form-deprivation myopia (FDM), in which viewing through a translucent diffuser causes blurred vision, and lens-induced myopia (LIM), in which defocus by a negative lens causes hyperopic defocus and compensatory axial elongation [[7]Troilo D. Smith III, E.L. Nickla D.L. et al.IMI - Report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60: M31-M88https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25967Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar]. Studies using these models in laboratory animals, ranging from hatchling chickens to mammals including non-human primates (NHPs), has contributed much to understanding what causes myopia [[7]Troilo D. Smith III, E.L. Nickla D.L. et al.IMI - Report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60: M31-M88https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25967Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar]; but still, after decades of such studies, that understanding remains imperfect. Research on NHPs is most informative, but it remains slow, cumbersome, expensive, and limited by ethical considerations. Research on chicks is more rapid, economical and productive, but the eyes of chicks and mammals are sufficiently different to limit direct translation of suggested therapies to human myopia. It follows, then, that a novel experimental animal model is needed, which offers low cost, high throughput testing of candidate drugs – and thus accelerated discovery of promising candidates for myopia treatment, involving limited follow-up studies in NHPs. In this issue of EBioMedicine, Lin et al. [[8]Lin M.-.Y. Lin I.-.T. Wu Y.-.C. Wang I.-.J. Stepwise candidate drug screening for myopia control by using zebrafish, mouse, and golden Syrian hamster myopia models.EBioMedicine. 2021; 65103263Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar] report a new model for screening anti-myopia drugs. A gene-silencing agent (morpholino) was used to null expression of the gene (zlum) encoding an extracellular matrix protein, lumican, in zebrafish embryos; this causes rapid and excessive enlargement of the sclera (outer coat of the eye). A library of miscellaneous drugs approved by the US FDA was then screened for ability to prevent scleral enlargement; atropine and several matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-inhibitors were found to be effective for zlum-null myopia, and testing in mice and hamsters demonstrated that they also inhibited FDM in mammals. The zebrafish zlum-silencing model focuses attention on myopia mechanisms and therapeutic targets in the sclera [[9]Zhao F. Zhou Q. Reinach P.S. et al.Cause and effect relationship between changes in scleral matrix metallopeptidase-2 expression and myopia development in mice.Am J Pathol. 2018; 188: 1754-1767https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.04.011Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar], where lumican is an important component of the scleral extracellular matrix. Whether lumican is expressed in the retina or choroid – through which visual control of scleral expansion is exercised – is unknown, but unlikely. The outcome of the zebrafish trials suggests that the sclera, rather than its retina-choroid input, is a direct target for anti-myopia actions of atropine and the other effective agents. This is particularly interesting, because the site of atropine's anti-myopia action has been subject to debate [[10]McBrien N.A. Stell W.K. Carr B. How does atropine exert its anti-myopia effects?.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013; 33: 373-378https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12052Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar]. In summary: This work is proof of principle, establishing the zebrafish as a model system for rapid and inexpensive high-throughput screening of candidate anti-myopia drugs. By identifying targets for myopia-inhibiting therapy in the sclera, the findings encourage new therapeutic developments that are independent of functions in the retina-RPE-choroid relay system – and which, unlike atropine, might have minimal effects on visual processing in the retina. Finally, the zlum-null model introduced here, based on disruption of the scleral extracellular matrix, might be modified to target structures and functions in other ocular tissues. The identification of specific cell types and neural circuits in the retina, plus the roles and mechanisms of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and choroid, would greatly expand its scope and power and likely yield new insights into the biological mechanisms responsible for human myopia, ultimately making possible rational therapies directed at those targets. WKS is the sole author. The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Stepwise candidate drug screening for myopia control by using zebrafish, mouse, and Golden Syrian Hamster myopia modelsStepwise drug screening in a range of models from zlum-MO-injected zebrafish to rodent FDM models identified effective compounds for preclinical myopia control or prevention. On the basis of the 640 compounds that were screened, MMP inhibitors may offer alternatives for clinical trials. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".