MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3136079283 · doi:10.1101/2021.03.11.434922

The pangenome of the fungal pathogen <i>Neonectria neomacrospora</i>

2021· preprint· en· W3136079283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Knud Nor Nielsen, Kimmo Sirén, Bent Petersen, Thomas Sicheritz‐Pontén, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen, Ole Kim Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsBiologyGenomeGeneticsGeneReference genome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The fungal plant pathogen Neonectria neomacrospora (C. Booth & Samuels) Mantiri & Samuels (Ascomycota, Hypocreales) is a bark parasite causing twig blight, canker, and in severe cases, dieback in fir ( Abies spp.). Although often described as a mild pathogen, foresty and phytosanitary agencies have expressed their concern for potential economic impact. Two epidemics caused by this species are known: one from eastern Canada and one current within Northern Europe. We present key genome features of N. neomacrospora , to facilitate the research into the biology of this pathogen. We present the first genome assembly of N. neomacrospora as well as the first pangenome within this genus. The reference genome for N. neomacrospora is a long-read sequenced Danish isolate, while the pangenome is pieced together using additional 60 short-read sequenced strains covering the known geographical distribution of the species, including Europe, North America, and China. The gapless reference genome consist of twelve chromosomes sequenced telomere to telomere to a total length of 37.1 Mb. The mitochondrial genome was assembled and circularised with a length of 22 Kb. The gapless nuclear genome contains a total of 11,291 annotated genes, where 642 only have a hypothetical function, and a 4.3 % repeat content. Two minor chromosomes are enriched in transposable elements, AT content, and effector candidates. Chromosome 12 segregates within the population, indicating an accessory nature. The pangenome compile 15,101 genes, 34% more genes than present in the single isolate reference genome of N. neomacrospora . These genes organise into 13,069 homologous clusters, of which 8,316 clusters are present in all analysed strains, 985 are private to single strains. The British Columbian population branched out before the other populations and are characterized by comparatively larger genomes. The increased genome size can be explained by an expansion of repetitive elements. The comparative analysis finds a higher number of genes with a signal peptide within N. neomacrospora and species within the genus compared to the closely related genera. A species-specific pattern is observed in the carbohydrate-active enzyme repertoire, with a reduced number of polysaccharide lyases, compared to other species within the genus. The CAZymes battery responsible for plant cell wall degradation is similar to that observed in necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic plant pathogenic fungi. The genome size of N. neomacrospora is close to the median size for Ascomycota but is the smallest genome within the Neonectria genus. Comparative analysis revealed significant intraspecies genome size differences between populations explained by a difference in repeat content. Isolates with the smallest genomes formed a monophyletic group consisting of all strains from Europe and Quebec. Based on the field observations, we assume that N. neomacrospora is a hemibiotroph. Our analysis revealed a secretome consistent with a hemibiotrophic lifestyle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→