A Novel Mobility-Aware Offloading Management Scheme in Sustainable Multi-Access Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) extends the provisioning of computing and storage capabilities from remote Cloud Data Centers (DC) to the proximity of end users via heterogeneous networks. By augmenting User Equipment (UE) with external computing power under the local coverage, Cloudlet-based offloading performs as a critical enabler to boost application execution performance and to prolong battery lifespan in the mobile devices. However, the mobility of UEs introduces intra-Cloudlet intermittent connections and inter-Cloudlet unbalanced load distributions in the MEC environment, which consequently leads to offloading failures and service downgrading. In this paper, we propose a novel MEC-based mobility-aware offloading model to solve the intra-Cloudlet offloading scheduling issue and inter-Cloudlet load-aware heterogeneous resource allocation issue in terms of concerning the offloading execution efficiency, task processing time constraints, and energy efficiency. A priority-based queue model is designed to formulate the intra-Cloudlet mobility-aware offloading scheduling problem, resolved by the adoption of the Particle Swarm heuristic. The energy-aware inter-Cloudlet resource selection procedure is formalized in a mobility-aware multi-site resource allocation model, which is further solved by lightweight dynamic load balancing. The results of the experiment indicate that the proposed framework can effectively improve the overall offloading service provisioning quality in the intra-Cloudlet and inter-Cloudlet offloading scenarios, compared to the current works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".