Spectral theory for self-adjoint quadratic eigenvalue problems - a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many physical problems require the spectral analysis of quadratic matrix polynomials $M\lambda^2+D\lambda +K$, $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$, with $n \times n$ Hermitian matrix coefficients, $M,\;D,\;K$. In this largely expository paper, we present and discuss canonical forms for these polynomials under the action of both congruence and similarity transformations of a linearization and also $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity transformations of the polynomial itself. Canonical structures for these processes are clarified, with no restrictions on eigenvalue multiplicities. Thus, we bring together two lines of attack: (a) analytic via direct reduction of the $n \times n$ system itself by $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity and (b) algebraic via reduction of $2n \times 2n$ symmetric linearizations of the system by either congruence (Section 4) or similarity (Sections 5 and 6) transformations which are independent of the parameter $\lambda$. Some new results are brought to light in the process. Complete descriptions of associated canonical structures (over $\mathbb{R}$ and over $\mathbb{C}$) are provided -- including the two cases of real symmetric coefficients and complex Hermitian coefficients. These canonical structures include the so-called sign characteristic. This notion appears in the literature with different meanings depending on the choice of canonical form. These sign characteristics are studied here and connections between them are clarified. In particular, we consider which of the linearizations reproduce the (intrinsic) signs associated with the analytic (Rellich) theory (Sections 7 and 9).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".