MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136240306 · doi:10.13001/ela.2021.5361

Spectral theory for self-adjoint quadratic eigenvalue problems - a review

2021· review· en· W3136240306 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Lancaster, I. Zaballa

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of Linear Algebra · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Regional Development FundEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsMathematicsHermitian matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsLambdaCanonical formPolynomialPure mathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many physical problems require the spectral analysis of quadratic matrix polynomials $M\lambda^2+D\lambda +K$, $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$, with $n \times n$ Hermitian matrix coefficients, $M,\;D,\;K$. In this largely expository paper, we present and discuss canonical forms for these polynomials under the action of both congruence and similarity transformations of a linearization and also $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity transformations of the polynomial itself. Canonical structures for these processes are clarified, with no restrictions on eigenvalue multiplicities. Thus, we bring together two lines of attack: (a) analytic via direct reduction of the $n \times n$ system itself by $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity and (b) algebraic via reduction of $2n \times 2n$ symmetric linearizations of the system by either congruence (Section 4) or similarity (Sections 5 and 6) transformations which are independent of the parameter $\lambda$. Some new results are brought to light in the process. Complete descriptions of associated canonical structures (over $\mathbb{R}$ and over $\mathbb{C}$) are provided -- including the two cases of real symmetric coefficients and complex Hermitian coefficients. These canonical structures include the so-called sign characteristic. This notion appears in the literature with different meanings depending on the choice of canonical form. These sign characteristics are studied here and connections between them are clarified. In particular, we consider which of the linearizations reproduce the (intrinsic) signs associated with the analytic (Rellich) theory (Sections 7 and 9).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Journal of Linear AlgebraSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207