MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136302784

Mapping and characterization of the Upper Lake Agassiz beaches along the Manitoba Escarpment between the international border and the Assiniboine River

2006· dissertation· en· W3136302784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyle McMillan

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscarpmentGeologyGeographyArchaeologyPhysical geographyHydrology (agriculture)OceanographyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paleo-shorelines of glacial Lake Agassiz are inferred from beach ridges and wave-formed scarps. Shoreline features of the oldest, uppermost beaches, the Herman, Norcross, and Tintah groups of beaches, were mapped from aerial photographs in southern Manitoba between about the Canada - U.S. border and the Assiniboine River (-49.0" - 49.5" N latitude). Aerial photo maps were initially made on transparent overlays and later digitized. This mapping was supplemented by fieldwork, including ground penetrating radar surveys, power augering, and by data from existing boreholes, pit surveys, and soil surveys. The Herman, Norcross, and Tintah beach sets each contain several low-relief beach ridges that extend discontinuously over tens of kilometres; these ridges are generally less than 3 m in relief, and a few tens of metres wide. In places, beach ridges are replaced by erosional scarps, metres to tens of metres in relief and continuous over distances of tens of kilometres. Sediments in the Herman, Norcross, and Tintah beaches range from units of well sorted sand to sand-gravel diamictons; sediments between beaches include clayey to sandy silts, and gravel lags. These three beach sets predate the well-developed Upper Campbell Beach, which was deposited about 9.4 14C ka, and are distinct from it because of their lateral discontinuity and much poorer sorting. Based on their small size, poor sorting of sediments, discontinuous development, and multiplicity, the Herman, Norcross, and Tintah beaches, are concluded to have formed by storms during shoreline regression, probably in sequence over only a few centuries, as there is no pronounced break in the continuum of beach ridges nor major differences in their size or characterisitics. The effects of lake ice may also help explain the discontinuous nature and sedimentological immaturity of these beach ridges. The Herman beach is thought to have formed about 11 14C ka, based on other dated events in the Lake Agassiz basin. It is concluded therefore that the Herman, Norcross, and Tintah bench sets represent a continuous period of episodic formation between about 11.0 - 10.8 14C ka. The Upper Campbell beach is well dated at 9.3 - 9.4 14C ka, and is too well-developed to be a storm beach; this beach was deposited following a transgression from a low-water lake phase that was initiated after the depostion of the lowest Tintah beach.-=

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207