MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136342206 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p417

Abstract P417: Critical Knowledge Gaps in Characterizing Cognitive Impairment Among Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients: Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature

2021· article· en· W3136342206 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Potter, Jennifer Meeks, Osman Khan, Vivek Misra, Gavin W. Britz, Sudha Seshadri, Daniel Woo, Farhaan Vahidy

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhageIncidence (geometry)CognitionStroke (engine)Cognitive impairmentNarrative reviewCognitive declineSystematic reviewPediatricsMEDLINEInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePsychiatryDementiaGlasgow Coma Scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Despite emerging evidence, trajectories of cognitive impairment (CI) among patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are not well characterized. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of literature within PubMed, using keywords [“Intracerebral hemorrhage” OR “ICH”] AND “Cognitive Impairment,” after 2010. Articles reporting assessments of post ICH CI were included. Articles limited to pre-clinical (animal) studies, non-English literature, other intracranial hemorrhages, traumatic ICH, narrative reviews, and patient under 18 years were excluded. Results: Based on selection criteria, we included 16 articles (graphic) that provide an assessment of post-ICH CI. Post-ICH CI had a reported incidence of up to 85% within the first 2 weeks. The proportion of ICH patients who experience an incident CI across a longer follow up time period have been reported with a high degree of variability; with reports at 3 (32.5 - 71%), 4 (78%), 6 (37 - 63.3%), 9 (47.1 - 100%), 18 (51%), 30 (25.8%), 40 (23%), 45.6 (52 - 64%) and 60 (37.4%) months. Though the assessment scales utilized are variable; 12 (75%) reports employed a version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment or Information Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. Lobar ICH was well identified, while non-lobar ICHs were variably grouped. Imaging markers have been reported in 10 (62.5%) reports. Though most studies report comorbidities and sociodemographic factors; stroke-specific severity / functional scales and genetic factors have only been considered by 2 (12.5%) articles each. Conclusions: At least 1 in 3 ICH survivors experience post-ICH CI over 12 months. There is an overall paucity of data on post-ICH CI, which highlights a critical need to characterize the natural history of post ICH CI in prospective cohorts and develop standardized assessment protocols for CI among ICH patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.088
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.088
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.006
Bibliometrics0.0250.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207