MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136381960 · doi:10.13227/j.hjkx.202008315

[Hydrochemical and Isotopic Characteristics in the Shallow Groundwater of the Fenhe River Basin and Indicative Significance].

2021· article· en· W3136381960 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicKarst Systems and Hydrogeology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGroundwaterHydrology (agriculture)Structural basinDrainage basinGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O of the Fenhe River groundwater are -70.2‰ and -9.6‰, which are similar to the isotope values of the precipitation from July to September, indicating that the groundwater may have originated from this period and that the groundwater recharge mode (dominant flow and piston flow) has a spatial variation. Rock weathering is the dominant source of ions in the groundwater, with an average contribution of 87%, while the contributions of atmospheric input and human activity are 8% and 5%, respectively. For rock weathering, silicate, evaporate, and carbonate rock contribute equally to the groundwater solutes, accounting for 32%, 28%, and 26%, respectively. The results of this study provide the basis for promoting the sustainable development and utilization of groundwater resources in the Fenhe River basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicKarst Systems and HydrogeologyFrench-language works237,207