MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136419273 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2011.0228

Por s’onor croistre’: mélanges de langue et de littérature médiévales offerts à Pierre Kunstmann ed. by Yvan G. Lepage, Christian Milat

2011· article· fr· W3136419273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Bolduc

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtMiracleHumanitiesArt historyClassicsHistoryPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LEPAGE, YVAN G., et CHRISTIAN MILAT, éd. ‘Por s’onor croistre’: mélanges de langue et de littérature médiévales offerts à Pierre Kunstmann. Ottawa: David, 2008. ISBN 978-289597 -100-9. Pp. 526. $36.00. Over his long career, Pierre Kunstmann, now professor emeritus at the University of Ottawa, has produced research breathtaking in scope, spanning literature (Old French, Greek, Sanskrit), linguistics (grammar, syntax), lexicography, and computer science. This collection in his honor skillfully captures the wide-ranging studies of this eminent scholar. Divided into three parts, the collection comprises essays devoted to literary studies, language and lexicography, and ‘varia,’ illustrating the breadth and influence of Kunstmann’s work. It opens with a sensitive biography (Lepage). The literary studies begin with the Miracles de Nostre Dame (MND), a primary area of Kunstmann’s research: the dream vision MND of Jean Miélot (Loula Abd-elrazak); the diabolical seduction scenes in the MND par personnages (Elyse Dupras); generic forms of the miracle in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries (Francis Gingras); and the Latin/French tituli and rubrics of Gautier de Coinci’s MND (Kathy M. Krause). We then find studies of chansons de geste: narrative and metric divisions of the Charroi de Nîmes (Edward A. Heinemann); the transformation of twelfth-century topoi in the fifteenth-century (Dorothea Kullmann), and machines and automatons in the chansons de geste (Leslie Zarker Morgan). This first part concludes with essays on the anonymous jeu-parti Amis, ki est li muelz vaillanz and its unusual female perspective (Ineke Hardy); the bilingual school audience of the Aalma French-Latin glossary [BnF lat. 14748] (Brian Merrilees); and Gand MS 2749 in light of the Crusades (Bruno Roy). The essays on language and lexicography commence with the MND: terms of lexicographical interest from Kunstmann’s 1996 Lexique des ‘Miracles de Nostre Dame par personages’ (Hiltrud Gerner); micro-variations in word forms in the Treize Miracles de Nostre-Dame (Yuji Kawaguchi); and regionalisms in the Miracles de Nostre-Dame de Chartres (Gilles Roques). The rest of the essays here are sundry, including linguistic and grammatical studies: support verb constructions in three twelfth-century romances (France Martineau, Cinzia Pignatelli, and Lene Schøsler); early attestation of lexemes in the Règle de Saint Benoît (Takeshi Matsumura); the schwa in the Mystère du siège d’Orléans (Yves Charles Morin); the final ‘s’ and ‘z’ in Chrétien de Troyes [BnF fr. 794] (May Plouzeau). We also find lexicographical and sociolinguistic analyses: maritime vocabulary in the Estoire de la guerre sainte (Catherine Croizy-Naquet); Latin, Old French, and Middle Dutch in charters of the Abbey of Ninove (Catharina Peersman); the Spanish-Latin Vocabulario of Nebrija (René Pellen); and maritime Italianisms in Marco Polo’s Devisement du Monde (Philippe Ménard). The third part, ‘Varia’, is aptly named. Here we find essays on lyric and poetry: rhyme and assonance in twelfth-century narrative (Charles Doutrelepont); a lectio poetica of a Charles d’Orléans codex (Claudio Galderisi); the style—testimonial, didactic—of Commynes (Robert Martin); and musical chansons in late fifteenthcentury court poetry (Paul Merkley). We discover studies of the modern reception of medieval literature, including Marxist readings of Chrétien de Troyes’s Pesme Aventure (Alain Corbellari); the mystical Wolfram von Eschenbach in Wagner’s Tannhäuser (Maxime Prévost); and the genesis of Wagner’s Lohengrin (Danielle Buschinger). We also find essays on medievalists and computers: PBLit, an interface for exploring multiple databases (Madeleine Jeay and Stéfan Sinclair); a morphological /syntactical labeling system for the Chanson de Roland (Fernande Dupuis and Christiane Marchello-Nizia); and the Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam’s syntactical Reviews 587 annotation (Achim Stein). Concluding the collection is Christian Vandendorpe’s essay on the translation of Aeschylean verse, which neatly brings the reader back to where Kunstmann himself began. The editors on several occasions missed opportunities to place individual essays in dialogue by means of proximity (the order of the essays, particularly in the third part, appears arbitrary); however, the essays are generally of an excellent quality. This collection attests to Professor Kunstmann’s significant contributions to Old French scholarship, and to his influence on scholars from a host of different...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207