Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is an efficient implementation of linear programming (LP) decoding for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. By adding penalty terms to the objective function of the LP decoding model, ADMM variable node (VN) penalized decoding can suppress the non-integral solutions and improve the frame error rate (FER) performance in the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region. In this paper, we propose a novel ADMM check node (CN) penalized decoding algorithm. Codeword solutions which satisfy all parity-check equations will have smaller penalty values than non-codeword solutions, including the non-integral solutions. We discuss the required properties of CN-penalty functions, propose a few functions that satisfy those properties, and study their performance/complexity trade-offs. We also investigate the convergence properties of the proposed algorithm and prove that its performance is independent of the transmitted codeword. Using Monte Carlo simulations and instanton analysis, we then demonstrate that the proposed CN-penalized decoder outperforms ADMM VN penalized decoders in both waterfall and error floor regions. This comes at the expense of some increase in the decoding complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".