Dolomite genesis in bioturbated marine zones of an early-middle Miocene coastal mud volcano outcrop (Kuwait)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The origin of spheroidal dolomitized burrow from Al-Subiya sabkha in Kuwait was previously described as enigmatic as no evidence of precursor calcium carbonate was found in the siliciclastic sediment. An assumption for the genesis of spheroidal dolomite from the same area was attributed to hydrocarbon seepage but no evidence was provided. Here, we investigated a recently discovered early-middle Miocene coastal mud volcano outcrop in Al-Subiya sabkha where dolomitized burrows and spheroidal dolomite are found in bioturbated marine zones, and associated with traces of salt. Conversely, the continental zone lacks bioturbation features, dolomite and traces of salt, which together contrast with bioturbated rich marine zones. Geochemical signatures of Rare Earth Elements + Yttrium show a true positive Ce anomaly (Ce/Ce* > 1.2) and positive Eu/Eu* anomaly of spheroidal dolomite indicating strictly anoxic conditions, and sulphate reduction to sulphide, respectively. Our results are suggestive of a relationship between dolomite formation and interdependent events of hydrocarbon seepage, flux of hypersaline seawater, bioturbation, and fluid flow in the marine zones of the mud volcano. The bioturbation activity of crustaceans introduced channels/burrows in the sediment-water interface allowing for the mixing of seeped pressurized hydrocarbon-charged fluids, and evaporitic seawater. In the irrigated channels/burrows, the seeped pressurized hydrocarbon-charged fluids were oxidized via microbial consortia of methanotrophic archaea and sulphate-reducing bacteria resulting in elevated alkalinity and saturation index with respect to dolomite, thus providing the preferential geochemical microenvironment for dolomite precipitation in the bioturbated sediment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".