Performance Analysis and Prediction for Mobile Internet-of-Things (IoT) Networks: A CNN Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasingly mature sensor technology and the increasing popularity of broadband network, “the Internet-of-Everything” era is coming, and the mobile Internet of Things (IoT) is booming around the world. However, the mobile IoT communication networks face serious challenges, which are caused by the complex and variable communication environments. The mobile IoT applications can produce large-scale data, which will consume substantial energy. The transmit antenna selection (TAS) and cooperative communication schemes are commonly used to reduce the complexity and the energy consumption, which directly impact the performance of mobile IoT networks. To evaluate the performance of mobile IoT networks, it is important to analyze outage probability (OP) performance. In this article, we investigate the OP performance analysis of mobile IoT communication networks and propose an OP intelligent prediction algorithm based on an improved convolutional neural network (CNN). First, the mobile OP performance is analyzed by combining the TAS and decode-and-forward cooperative schemes, and the exact OP expressions are derived. Then, an improved CNN is designed to avoid the loss of important information, which contains the input layer, three-convolution layer, one fully connected layer, and output layer. The proposed CNN-based prediction approach is compared with the radial basis function (RBF), generalized regression (GR), Elman, and extreme learning machine (ELM) methods. The simulation results validate that the proposed CNN prediction approach can achieve a better prediction effect than RBF, Elman, GR, and ELM methods. For the CNN approach, it has a 44% increase in the prediction accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".