MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136822850 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13383

An Edge Computing-Based Complex Event Processing Technique for Sensor-Based Systems

2018· dissertation· en· W3136822850 on OpenAlexafffund
Amarjit Singh Dhillon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkEvent (particle physics)Embedded systemDefault gatewayEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionReal-time computingComplex event processingOperating systemDistributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex Event Processing (CEP) on sensor-based systems often uses a mobile gateway agent to forward raw sensor data streams to a remote back-end server.Complex events that are triggered by multiple raw events are then detected at the back-end server.This approach relies on a persistent network connection between the back-end server and the mobile device.This thesis proposes an edge computing-based mobile CEP technique in which CEP is performed on the mobile edge device using an embedded CEP engine and the detected complex events are sent to the back-end server for further processing.A proof-of-concept prototype for this system has been built using a Siddhi CEP engine and a WSO 2 server.A thorough performance analysis is performed for comparing the proposed system with the back-end server-based system.The proposed system can handle intermittent network disconnections and leads to reduced user cost and energy consumption for the mobile device."No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it" -Albert EinsteinThe work presented in this dissertation would not have been realized without the assistance of many individuals.I take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who helped me during this journey.Foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Shikharesh Majumdar and Dr. Marc St-Hilaire for their continuous guidance, motivation, and feedback throughout the process.Secondly, I would like to thank my parents for providing me with monetary support and moralistic encouragement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207