MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137074573 · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.001

Corrigendum to ‘Comparing 36.5°C with 37°C for human embryoculture: a prospective randomized controlled trial’ [Reproductive BioMedicine Online 36 (2018) 620-626]

2021· erratum· en· W3137074573 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Fawzy, Mai Emad, Mostafa A. Gad, Mohamed Sabry, Hesham Kasem, Manar Mahmoud, Mohamed A. Bedaiwy

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive BioMedicine Online · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialRegretBiomedicineConfidence intervalEmbryoProspective cohort studyMedicineGynecologyBiologySurgeryInternal medicineBioinformaticsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueReproductive BioMedicine OnlineSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207