MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3137091187 · doi:10.1101/2021.03.18.21253910

Transdiagnostic Neural Signatures in common Pediatric Psychiatric Disorders: a data-driven meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies

2021· preprint· en· W3137091187 on OpenAlexafffund
Jules R. Dugré, Simon B. Eickhoff, Stéphane Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéEli Lilly CanadaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsNeuroimagingMeta-analysisPsychologyAnxietyMajor depressive disorderNeural correlates of consciousnessClinical psychologyPsychiatryMedicineCognitionPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND In the last decades, neuroimaging studies have attempted to unveil the neurobiological markers underlying pediatric psychiatric disorders. However, children diagnosed with such disorders are likely to receive an additional diagnosis in the following years. Yet, the vast majority of neuroimaging studies focus on a single nosological category, which limit our understanding of the shared/specific neural correlates between these disorders. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the transdiagnostic neural signatures through a novel meta-analytical method. METHOD A data-driven meta-analysis was carried out which grouped similar experiments topographic map together, irrespectively of nosological categories and task-characteristics. Then, activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis was performed on each group of experiments to extract spatially convergent brain regions. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven experiments were retrieved (3199 subjects): 79 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 32 conduct/oppositional defiant disorder, 14 anxiety disorders, 22 major depressive disorders. Four significant groups of experiments were observed. Functional characterization suggested that these groups of aberrant brain regions may be implicated internally/externally directed processes, attentional control of affect, somato-motor and visual processes. Furthermore, despite that some differences in rates of studies involving major depressive disorders were noticed, nosological categories were evenly distributed between these four sets of regions. Additionally, main effects of task characteristics were observed. CONCLUSIONS By using a data-driven meta-analytic method, we observed four significant groups of aberrant brain regions that may reflect transdiagnostic neural signature of pediatric psychiatric disorders. Overall, results of this study underscore the importance of studying pediatric psychiatric disorders simultaneously rather than independently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.048
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→