MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137102163 · doi:10.3917/nresi.089.0167

La gestion de classe sous le prisme des perceptions des élèves avec difficultés comportementales : une recension des écrits

2021· article· fr· W3137102163 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Bernier, Nancy Gaudreau, Line Massé

Bibliographic record

Venue˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives/˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La scolarisation des élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales et émotionnelles (PDC) représente un défi de taille pour plusieurs systèmes éducatifs ayant pris un virage inclusif dans les dernières années. Souvent exclus de la classe ordinaire, ces élèves sont nombreux à témoigner d’un vécu plus négatif que leurs pairs à l’école. D’ailleurs, la nature et l’intensité des problèmes comportementaux des élèves PDC les amènent à être confrontés à toute une diversité de pratiques de gestion de classe, à propos desquelles ils ont un point de vue fort pertinent, mais relativement peu écouté, concernant ce qui fonctionne (ou pas). Cet article vise donc à présenter les résultats d’une recension des écrits sur les perceptions des élèves PDC vis-à-vis des pratiques de gestion de classe des enseignants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives/˜La œNouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusivesSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207