MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137164216 · doi:10.4000/nordiques.7330

Alva Myrdal, de l’ingénierie sociale aux négociations sur le désarmement nucléaire

2014· article· fr· W3137164216 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Hultqvist, Clémence Ledoux, Ulla Melin-Emilsson

Bibliographic record

VenueNordiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Architecte du modèle d’État providence nordique, détentrice du prix Nobel de la paix, Alva Myrdal a été l’un des personnages clefs de l’histoire politique du XXe siècle en Suède. Étonnamment, ses contributions à la politique internationale sont beaucoup moins connues. Ayant été l’une des premières femmes ambassadrices de Suède, elle a avancé des idées innovantes sur le développement social au service de l’égalité entre les peuples. Représentant la Suède dans les négociations sur le désarmement pendant la guerre froide, elle a joué un rôle crucial pour introduire des solutions non conventionnelles, alors que la situation semblait être gelée et les deux superpuissances incapables de parvenir à un accord. Son engagement contre les armes nucléaires et pour la paix lui valut le prix Nobel en 1982. L’objectif de cet article est d’analyser l’ouverture contemporaine de la Suède à l’international à travers la trajectoire d’Alva Myrdal et de montrer les points de continuité entre les positions qu’elle a défendues en politiques intérieure et extérieure. Cet article biographique se concentre bien plus sur la seconde période de la vie d’Alva Myrdal que sur sa contribution initiale à l’édification de l’État providence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNordiquesSame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207