The Cost of OSCORE and EDHOC for Constrained Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many modern IoT applications rely on the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). Recently, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed two novel protocols for securing it. These are: 1) Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) providing authenticated encryption for the CoAP's payload data and 2) Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman Over COSE (EDHOC) providing the symmetric session keys required for OSCORE. In this paper, we present the design of four firmware libraries for these protocols which are especially targeted for constrained microcontrollers and their detailed evaluation. More precisely, we present the design of uOSCORE and μEDHOC libraries for regular microcontrollers and μOSCORE-TEE and μEDHOC-TEE libraries for microcontrollers with a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), such as microcontrollers featuring ARM TrustZone-M. Our firmware design for the latter class of devices concerns the fact that attackers may exploit common software vulnerabilities, e.g., buffer overflows in the protocol logic, OS or application to compromise the protocol security. We present an evaluation of our implementations in terms of RAM/FLASH requirements and execution speed on a broad range of microcontrollers. Our implementations are available as open-source software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".