MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137209623 · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100265

Defatting strategies in the current era of liver steatosis

2021· review· en· W3137209623 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Mazilescu, Markus Selzner, Nazia Selzner

Bibliographic record

VenueJHEP Reports · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto General Hospital
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsSteatosisDefattingMedicineFatty liverLiver transplantationLiver diseaseInternal medicineDiseaseTransplantationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liver steatosis is emerging as a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, mainly due to the increasing rate of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Because of the increased incidence of liver steatosis, many organs are currently declined for transplantation despite high demand and waiting list mortality. Defatting strategies have recently emerged as a means of rapidly reducing liver steatosis to expand the pool of available organs. This review summarises advances in defatting strategies in experimental and human models of liver steatosis over the last 20 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJHEP ReportsSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207