MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137218525 · doi:10.4000/books.pub.34038

Leçon sur la construction d’un récit historique : l’usage du texte et de l’image dans la bande dessinée Les Loxley et la guerre de 1812

2016· book-chapter· fr· W3137218525 on OpenAlexaffabout
Josée Desforges

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Loxley et la guerre de 1812 est le titre d’une bande dessinée interactive produite par l’Office national du film du Canada (ONF) et subventionnée en grande partie par le ministère du Patrimoine canadien (PCH). L’œuvre, accessible gratuitement sous forme d’application numérique depuis le 8 novembre 2012, s’inscrit dans la volonté de l’ancien gouvernement conservateur dirigé par Stephen Harper de commémorer la guerre de 1812 comme l’un des jalons pré-confédéralistes de l’Histoire canadienne...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooksSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207