MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Justin Trudeau on Increasing the Role of Canada in the International Stage

2020· article· id· W3137224658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Celine Nugroho

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sentris · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceBaruBureaucracyPublic administrationLawPoliticsHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kanada telah menjalani 9 tahun di bawah pemerintahan Partai Konservatif dan Stephen Harper sebagai Perdana Menteri hingga Oktober 2015. Kebijakan luar negeri yang dianut juga didasarkan pada pandangan kaum konservatif sebagai partai utama di Kanada. Terpilihnya Justin Trudeau dari Partai Liberal menjadi Perdana Menteri Kanada ke-23, menggantikan Stephen Harper, membawa Kanada pada arah baru kebijakan luar negeri dan peran Kanada di kancah internasional. Trudeau telah memperlihatkan dirinya sebagai pemimpin dunia muda yang membawa inovasi dan perubahan yang sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman. Terobosan baru dalam politik luar negeri yang berbeda dengan Perdana Menteri Kanada sebelumnya dan keaktifannya melakukan diplomasi publik menyebabkan Trudeau menjadi figur politisi baru yang fenomenal. Lewat pemerintahan Trudeau, Kanada akan semakin memperluas pengaruh dan perannya dalam kancah internasional. Cara Trudeau dalam menyelesaikan agenda politik luar negerinya serta membangun citra baru Kanada yang lebih aktif di dunia internasional patut diulas lebih lanjut dengan menggunakan konsep public diplomacy dan pendekatan bureaucratic structures and processes to foreign policy, yang berfokus pada organizational processes model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal SentrisSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207