The genera<i>Brianaria</i>(<i>Psoraceae</i>) and<i>Micarea</i>(<i>Pilocarpaceae</i>) in Japan, with reports on other interesting species in Asia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An examination of collections from Japan has increased the number ofBrianariaandMicareaspecies known from that country from eight to 19, including one new species,M. rubioidesCoppins (also from Malaysia and the Philippines). Eleven species are reported as new to Japan (M. botryoides(Nyl.) Coppins,M. denigrata(Fr.) Hedl.,M. erratica(Körb.) Hertelet al.,M. hedlundiiCoppins,M. lithinella(Nyl.) Hedl.,M. micrococca(Körb.) Gams ex Coppins andM. misella(Nyl.) Hedl.) or new to Asia:M. byssacea(Th. Fr.) Czarnotaet al.,M. deminutaCoppins andM. xanthonicaCoppins & Tønsberg (new to Asia; Japan);M. nitschkeana(J. Lahm ex Rabenh.) Harm. (new to Asia; South Korea). The presence ofMicarea prasinas. str. from Japan needs to be confirmed; no collection was found in this study. Additional collections from South Korea and Sri Lanka are also reported, including the new speciesM. ceylanicaCoppins from Sri Lanka. The identity ofM. synotheoides(Nyl.) Coppins, originally described from Japan, has been resolved, resulting in the renaming of Western European material, previously under that name, asM. longisporaCoppins.Micarea coreanaLőköset al. is reported here as a synonym ofM. erratica. The type ofLecidea inopinulaNyl. requires the new combinationMicarea inopinula(Nyl.) Coppins & T. Sprib. to replaceMicarea prasinella(Jatta) I. M. Lamb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".