MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137270082 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2017.0302

Coprésences, entrecroisements: le pictural et le narratif chez Marie-Claire Blais et Sergio Kokis by Kirsty Bell

2017· article· fr· W3137270082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheridan Scott

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt historyCriticismLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

image ne se fige pas, elle s’arrête néanmoins sur le visage d’Adama qui nous regarde droit dans les yeux,assis sagement dans une nouvelle salle de classe quelque part dans la Creuse,un petit sourire triomphant aux lèvres après avoir murmuré—sans hésitation— les vers de du Bellay. Si la question identitaire ne se pose pas ici, la trajectoire de l’adolescent reprend les caractéristiques principales du récit d’apprentissage et parvient quelque peu à nous faire oublier les excès narratifs qui emprisonnent la banlieue dans une vision dichotomique et misérabiliste. DePauw University (IN) Cheira Belguellaoui Literary History and Criticism edited by Marion Geiger Bell, Kirsty. Coprésences, entrecroisements: le pictural et le narratif chez Marie-Claire Blais et Sergio Kokis.Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2014. ISBN 978-90-420-3887-5. Pp. 272. 61 a. As part of the Chiasma series, this significant volume on the interplay between text and image in selected works of two Québécois authors exemplifies the collection’s goals of “focusing upon joinings and criss-crossings [...] in the realm of modern French literature,”with studies that“may be of an interdisciplinary nature, developing connections with art, philosophy, linguistics and beyond” (5). Beginning with a succinct but thorough synthesis of critical theory relating to interarts discourse, the book’s first chapter serves as an excellent introduction to the methodological framework necessary for mining the wealth of interdisciplinary perspectives found in the four novels studied: Une saison dans la vie d’Emmanuel and Le sourd dans la ville by Marie-Claire Blais, and L’art du maquillage and Le pavillon des miroirs by Sergio Kokis. Although Bell acknowledges the possibly incongruous nature of a comparison of the authors and works examined, this interdisciplinary study carefully establishes an organizational context in which the works in question demonstrate the potential of the critical discourse, from the distinction between images in praesentia and those in absentia, to ekphrasis, paratextuality, and intertextuality. Rather than highlight the differences between the two arts,“une exploration de ce qui relie et de ce qui distingue les formes et les fonctions de ces deux modes d’expression est fondamentale: elle nous permet d’identifier les lieux d’intersection et les modalités de combinaison”(21). Moreover, the book astutely refers to Antoine Boisclair and Vincent Lambert’s assertion that Québécois artistic modernity was based on the relationship between literature and painting (38–39), insisting on the innumerable texts from Québécois literary history that rely upon this dynamic. Readers from established academics to graduate students will appreciate the detailed analysis in the following chapters, 246 FRENCH REVIEW 90.3 Reviews 247 including an examination of the illustrated edition of Une saison dans la vie d’Emmanuel by Mary Meigs and a consideration of Blais’s expressionist aesthetic and reference to specific artworks (Edvard Munch, George Grosz), in addition to the beautifully nuanced discussions of the importance of Kokis’s paintings within his literary creations. While Bell is careful not to claim the role of art critic or historian, this impressive volume deftly handles concepts ranging from artist biography and selfportraiture to the use and affective value of color in convincingly explicating the fascinating “coprésences” and “entrecroisements” between text and image in these Québécois works. Lastly, although the concluding chapter is rather short and unsatisfying in its summary restating of evidence, it offers many suggestions for further avenues of possible research on related subjects—most notably the undoubtedly fertile study of the character of the artist in Québécois literature. Illinois Wesleyan University Scott Sheridan Best,Francine,Bruno Blanckeman,et Francine Dugast-Portes,éd.Annie Ernaux: le temps et la mémoire. Paris: Stock, 2014. ISBN 978-2-234-07821-5. Pp. 486. 23 a. In personal remarks included in this volume, Ernaux expresses a sense of wonder at having been the subject of a Colloque de Cerisy that attracted an international cast of participants from a range of disciplines. In her eyes, her work has always been modest in scope:“[J]e ne vois que la poursuite d’un désir obscur, persévérant, solitaire, de mettre...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207