MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimization of Water-Food Nexus System under Dual Uncertainties

2021· article· en· W3137277230 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Ma, Li Yang, Guohe Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Arable landAgricultural engineeringProbabilistic logicNexus (standard)Environmental scienceAgricultureConstraint (computer-aided design)Farm waterWater resource managementWater resourcesEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceWater conservationMathematicsEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, a fuzzy chance-constrained programming (FCCP) method is developed to synergetic plan water-food nexus (WFN) system under dual uncertainties. The developed method can tackle uncertainties expressed as probabilistic distribution and flexible parameter. Then, a FCCP-WFN model is formulated for the city of Jinan (China), in which 72 scenarios are designed with the consideration of different food demand levels, constraint-violation risk levels, and satisfactory degrees. Results indicate that (i) surface water would be the main water source for Jinan (accounting for 62.7% of water supply), and agriculture would be the largest water consumer (accounting for 55.5% of water allocation), therefore, rational management of surface water and reduction of agricultural water allocation are essential to alleviate the water shortage problem in Jinan; (ii) the annual arable land area is 628.4×10 3 ha to 683.4×10 3 ha, of which grain crops account for 62.1%, and the sufficient grain planting area can ensure food security in Jinan; (iii) uncertainties have significant influence on water allocation schemes, thus, managers should consider the impact of uncertainties during decision-making process, and make different management schemes according to different attitudes to system risks under undetermined conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207