Pour une archivistique sociale : esquisse d’un bilan de dix ans de recherche en archivistique à l’Université d’Angers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente contribution propose un bilan de quelque dix ans de recherche en archivistique à l’Université d’Angers. Les motivations de ce programme de recherche, ses orientations thématiques et ses objets sont envisagés. On aborde aussi les questions de structuration institutionnelle et de financement de cette recherche, de son positionnement, au coeur des systèmes universitaires et archivistiques français, ainsi que celle de ses méthodes, nécessairement fortement interdisciplinaires ou pluridisciplinaires. Quelques conclusions ou acquis sur trois axes principaux sont esquissés : histoire renouvelée des institutions archivistiques aux XIXe-XXe siècles, mise en histoire des pratiques archivistiques, des usages et des logiques d’usages des archives. Ces remarques et réflexions autorisent la formulation d’un sous-champ disciplinaire qu’on propose d’appeler une archivistique sociale, attentive à toutes les formes d’interactions entre archives et société à travers certes les services d’archives et les archivistes labellisés, mais aussi tous les autres lieux d’archives présents dans la société.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.028 | 0.024 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".