Target Capture Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Using the ONETest Coronaviruses Plus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Genomic sequencing is important to track and monitor genetic changes in SARS-CoV-2. We introduce a target capture next-generation sequencing methodology, the ONETest Coronaviruses Plus, to sequence SARS-CoV-2 genomes and select genes of other respiratory viruses simultaneously. Methods We applied the ONETest on 70 respiratory samples (collected in Florida, USA between May and July, 2020), in which SARS-CoV-2 had been detected by a qualitative PCR assay. For 48 (69%) of the samples, we also applied the ARTIC protocol for Illumina sequencing. All the libraries were sequenced as 2×150 nucleotide reads on an Illumina instrument. The ONETest data were analyzed using an in-house pipeline and the ARTIC data using a published pipeline to produce consensus SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences, to which lineages were assigned using pangolin . Results Of the 70 ONETest libraries, 45 (64%) had a complete or near-complete SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence (> 29,000 bases and with > 90% of its bases covered by at least 10 reads). Of the 48 ARTIC libraries, 25 (52%) had a complete or near-complete SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence. In 24 out of 34 (71%) samples in which both the ONETest and ARTIC sequences were complete or near-complete and in which lineage could be assigned to both the ONETest and ARTIC sequences, the SARS-CoV-2 lineage identified was the same. Conclusions The ONETest can be used to sequence the SARS-CoV-2 genomes in archived samples and thereby enable detection of circulating and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Target capture approaches, such as the ONETest, are less prone to loss of sequence coverage probably due to amplicon dropouts encountered in amplicon approaches, such as ARTIC. With its added value of characterizing other major respiratory pathogens, although not assessed in this study, the ONETest can help to better understand the epidemiology of infectious respiratory disease in the post COVID-19 era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".