Effects of experimental flow manipulations on water quality, hypoxia, and growth of Threatened Salish sucker (<i>Catostomus</i> sp. cf. <i>catostomus</i>) and juvenile coho salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i>)<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Salish sucker (Catostomus sp. cf. catostomus) is a federally Threatened species in Canada, inhabiting small lowland streams along with juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in southwestern British Columbia and adjacent Washington State. Experiments were conducted in two ponds to determine the effects of reduced flow on dissolved oxygen, growth of stocked Salish sucker and juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), and fish movement using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags. Sequential flow reduction in the first experiment resulted in a significant decrease in dissolved oxygen (9.1 to 3.1 mg·L−1) and Salish sucker growth (23% decline), although lower dissolved oxygen and growth were confounded with decreased temperature. Flow reduction in a second split-pond experiment including coho salmon resulted in significantly lower dissolved oxygen (6.9 to 2.9 mg·L−1), a 51% reduction in growth of coho salmon, but no detectable change in Salish sucker growth. PIT tag detections demonstrated increased use by both species of a well-oxygenated refuge in the flow reduction treatment, indicating sublethal effects of hypoxia on fish behaviour and habitat use. These experiments demonstrate the induction of severe hypoxia by reduced flows under eutrophy, with the potential for negative impacts on Salish sucker and juvenile coho salmon growth and habitat use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".