MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137361042 · doi:10.1080/00918369.2021.1892403

It Feels Like Yesterday: Drag, Nostalgia, and Queer Affective History in <i>The Vaudevillians</i>

2021· article· en· W3137361042 on OpenAlexaff
Cameron Crookston

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Homosexuality · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerBannerEthosFandomYesterdayAestheticsMythologySociologyArtGender studiesPsychoanalysisLiteratureHistoryPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, tells the story of Kitty Witless and Dr. Dan von Dandy, a vaudeville duo whose career was cut short in the 1920s, when they were caught in an avalanche and frozen alive. The conceit of the show is that, during their 90-year hiatus, generations of performers pilfered their songbook and passed them off as their own. Now, they have thawed out and are back to reclaim their intellectual property. In this article, I argue that Kitty and Dan's quest to reclaim queer coded music under the banner of a single queer authorship gives shape and form to the tradition of queer coding, while also creating an affective history and queer origin myth that exposes the queer temporal ethos of nostalgic drag performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HomosexualitySame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207