MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3137391265 · doi:10.1183/13993003.04025-2020

Socioeconomic disadvantage and lung health: accumulating evidence to support health policy

2021· letter· en· W3137391265 on OpenAlexaff
Sanja Stanojevic

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusPsychological interventionDisadvantageHealth equitySocial determinants of healthEnvironmental healthPosition (finance)MedicinePsychologyPublic healthPolitical scienceBusinessNursingPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the associations between socioeconomic position and lung health provides the scaffold of evidence from which to develop better policies and interventions to reduce the disparities in social determinants, exposures and ultimately outcomeshttps://bit.ly/390kbJx

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0260.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory Journal→Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→