Stable brain PET metabolic networks using a multiple sampling scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The human brain’s interregional communication is vital for its proper functioning. A promising direction for investigating how these regions communicate relies on the assumption that the brain is a complex network. In this context, images derived from positron emission tomography (PET) have been proposed as a potential source for understanding brain networks. However, such networks are often assembled via direct computation of inter-subject correlations, neglecting variabilities between subjects and jeopardizing the construction of group representative networks. Here, we used [ 18 F]FDG-PET data from 1027 individuals at different syndromal stages (352 CU, 621 MCI and 234 AD) to develop a novel method for constructing stable (i.e. resilient to spurious data points) metabolic brain networks. Our multiple sampling (MS) scheme generates brain networks with higher stability when compared to the conventional approach. In addition, the proposed method is robust to imbalanced datasets and requires 50% fewer subjects to achieve stability than the conventional approach. Our method has the potential to considerably boost PET data reutilization and advance our understating of human brain network patterns in health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".