MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137417851 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2014.0413

The French Way: How France Embraced and Rejected American Values and Power by Richard F. Kuisel

2014· article· en· W3137417851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amye R. Sukapdjo

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsHistoryPower (physics)Great powerLawEconomic historyClassicsMedia studiesPolitical scienceArt historySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviews 289 examine the tensions between theoretical doctrine and practical battlefield experience which triggered an evolution of French trench tactics over the course of 1915 as a whole. Krause effectively makes the case that, far from being a year of stagnation, 1915 was a crucial year in the learning curve of trench warfare, and that French commanders in particular were quick to grasp that year’s lessons. The potential reader of this book should be aware that this is not a social, cultural, or political history of the First World War. Those looking for such a history should search elsewhere. However, for the reader interested in the military history of the war, this book is an excellent choice. It is tempting to oversimplify events of the Great War and embrace the standard clichés that have been reiterated decade after decade in its wake. The solid detail and analysis of Krause’s Early Trench Tactics shakes up those clichés and forces the reader to reconsider the commonly perceived‘sterility’of early trench warfare. For the specialist military historian, or for the very well read amateur, this book is highly recommended. Ohio University Christopher Coski Kuisel, Richard F. The French Way: How France Embraced and Rejected American Values and Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2012. ISBN 978-0-691-15181-6. Pp. xi + 487. $29.98. Kuisel takes on the thorny task of analyzing the complex and paradoxical political, economic, and cultural relationship between the United States and France over the past forty years. His intentions are to help Americans better understand France and “to clarify how the French, in recent decades, have viewed America and transatlantic relations” (377). Using government statistics, public opinion polls, journalists’ interviews, and media reports, he deftly explains the French perspective on multiple issues (e.g., the scientific discovery of HIV and an AIDS antiserum, NATO relations, involvement in the Iraqi War, a unified Germany, and the European Union) and the circumstances behind them. Kuisel outlines how France was often stripped of its ability to mediate its own political and economic future, and was compelled to protect its individual social and cultural identity. Politically, France wanted to be an independent, relevant European and world leader in international affairs, yet the United States always seemed to have another role in mind for its historical ally; this often put France into a secondary or tertiary position. Mitterrand and Chirac walked thin political lines at certain moments with Washington. Economically, France felt major reverberations from American business models as Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, and Disney moved across the Atlantic during this time, often with ruthless intent.While some American business practices (e.g.,privatization,stock options,part-time work) served as guides for modern French companies, these same practices also ran counter to the French people’s sense of social solidarity and cultural identity. Culturally, the French people felt especially affronted by the transatlantic wave. A shift in social habits in the 80s and 90s created enough of a stir to shape a unified resistance against all things uncivilized, or in other words American, such as: fast food, clothing, films, and English expressions. Ultimately it was here that the French made their greatest statement of resistance. Between the political, business, and cultural shifts during these decades, sentiments and outrage sparked anti-American movements among French intellectuals and politicians, which in turn created an anti-anti-Americanism. How could France imitate certain American approaches without compromising its own position as an important modern nation while simultaneously retaining its renowned collective identity? Herein was the struggle . France often paid a political or economic price for its resistance to America’s international moves. Kuisel argues that the“French Way”of resistance was how France was able to stave off the “American hyperpower” (vii), allowing this modern country to retain its“Frenchness”while settling into a new role in the age of globalization. This text is a richly detailed resource for explaining French-American binaries over the past four decades. University of North Georgia Amye R. Sukapdjo Menzies, Charles R. Red Flags and Lace Coiffes: Identity and Survival in a Breton Village. Toronto: UP of Toronto, 2011. ISBN 978-1-4426-0512...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207