RNA2HLA: HLA-based quality control of RNA-seq datasets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is a widely used approach for accessing the transcriptome in biomedical research. Studies frequently include multiple samples taken from the same individual at various time points or under different conditions, correct assignment of those samples to each particular participant is evidently of great importance. Here, we propose taking advantage of typing the highly polymorphic genes from the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex in order to verify the correct allocation of RNA-seq samples to individuals. We introduce RNA2HLA, a novel quality control (QC) tool for performing study-wide HLA-typing for RNA-seq data and thereby identifying the samples from the common source. RNA2HLA allows precise allocation and grouping of RNA samples based on their HLA types. Strikingly, RNA2HLA revealed wrongly assigned samples from publicly available datasets and thereby demonstrated the importance of this tool for the quality control of RNA-seq studies. In addition, our tool successfully extracts HLA alleles in four-digital resolution and can be used to perform massive HLA-typing from RNA-seq based studies, which will serve multiple research purposes beyond sample QC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it