MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137434207 · doi:10.36713/epra6538

A REVIEW ON EFFECT OF POTASSIUM AND CALCIUM ON DIFFERENT PARAMETERS ON PLANTS UNDER HYDROPONIC CONDITION

2021· review· en· W3137434207 on OpenAlexaff
Divya Rathor, Sandhya Verma, Hitesh Solanki

Bibliographic record

VenueEPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD) · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroponicsPotassiumOrnamental plantCalciumNutrientShootAgronomyYield (engineering)ProductivityCropHorticultureChemistryEnvironmental scienceBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroponics is a technique for better plant production in a liquid nutrient solution and without use of soil or artificial media. In this method almost all terrestrial plants, ornamental crops, vegetables, and foliage plants can be grown with their roots immersed directly to the mineral nutrient solution. This system provides better and higher crop yields, minimize the time of production and there is no weeding or cultivation required. The effect of calcium and potassium concentration affect the shoot, root and on the growth of plants. It enhance the structural, physiological as well as morphological parameters of plants. It shows the better quality and high yield of crops. This review is focused on the effect of potassium and calcium on the growth and productivity of plants. This article also evaluates the role of K and Ca under hydroponic system to test the different parameters. KEYWORDS : Hydroponic, Potassium, Calcium, Growth and Productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)Same topicInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics SystemsFrench-language works237,207