Effect of fear on two predator-one prey model in deterministic and fluctuating environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent ecological studies on predator-prey interactions has concentrated on determining the impacts of antipredator behavior due to fear of predators. These studies are mainly confined into one predator-one prey system. But in case of multiple predator attack on single prey species, fear mechanism is still unknown. The combined impact of multiple predator often cannot be anticipated from their independent effects. So coexistence of multiple predators and prey’s fitness becomes an important issue from an ecological point of view. Based on the above observations, we proposed and analyzed a model consisting of two competing predator sharing a common prey where prey’s reproduction rate is affected due to fear generated by the predators. We first study the boundedness, uniform persistence, stability and Hopf bifurcation of the deterministic model. Thereafter, we have investigated the existence and uniqueness of the global positive solution, boundedness, asymptotic stability of the stochastic model. Numerical examples are provided to support our obtained results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it