← all works
WITHDRAWN: Utilizing comparative models in biomedical research
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Duplication of Content through Error by Journal/Publisher;
- Date
- 5/20/2021 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology
- Topic
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Field
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Canadian institutions
- Carleton UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of OttawaQueen's University
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- AccidentalGene duplicationComputer scienceComputational biologyChemistryBiologyBiochemistryPhysics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no