MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137521122 · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c00683

Trace Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide via Dynamic Double Emulsions

2021· article· en· W3137521122 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Darryl Fong, Timothy M. Swager

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen peroxideEmulsionAqueous solutionCatalysisPeroxideSurface tensionAqueous two-phase systemChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen peroxide is a dynamic signaling molecule in biological systems. We report herein a versatile double emulsion sensor that can detect femtomolar quantities of aqueous hydrogen peroxide. The mechanism responsible for this sensitivity is a peroxide induced change in double emulsion structure, which results in a modified directional emission from dyes dissolved in the high index organic phase. The morphology (structure) of the double emulsion is controlled via interfacial tensions and a methyltrioxorhenium catalyzed sulfide oxidation results in an enhancement of the surfactant effectiveness. The incipient polar sulfoxide induced decrease of the interfacial tension at the organic-water (O-W) interface results in an increased interfacial area between the organic phase and water and a diminished emission perpendicular to the supporting substrate. The modularity of our sensory system is demonstrated through cascade catalysis between methyltrioxorhenium and oxidase enzymes, with the latter producing hydrogen peroxide as a byproduct to enable for the selective and sensitive detection of molecular and ionic enzymatic substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207