MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137532061 · doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2021.03.010

Mis-swallowing of Buckyballs, an overlooked threat to our children

2021· article· en· W3137532061 on OpenAlex
Yu Wang, Hsin-Ching Kuo, Ying C. Huang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics & Neonatology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMedicineBusinessMedical emergencyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous thriving of online shopping industries, promotions of various products have become more overwhelming to everyone, including teenagers and children. Hundreds of small rare-earth magnets, the so-called Buckyballs, are sold as table toys and are promoted as being able to enhance intelligence and innovation, as well as relieve stress; however, no risks or warnings about “the other side of the coin” have been mentioned. In 2009, Buckyballs were first introduced as toys. Thereafter, increasing cases of mis-swallowing of these brightly-colored magnets in pediatric population were reported to cause serious gastrointestinal injury or death in extreme cases.1De Roo A.C. Thompson M.C. Chounthirath T. Xiang H. Cowles N.A. Shmuylovskaya L. et al.Rare-earth magnet ingestion-related injuries among children, 2000-2012.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013; 52: 1006-1013Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar,2Hodges N.L. Denny S.A. Smith G.A. Rare-earth magnet ingestion-related injuries in the pediatric population: a review.Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015; 11: 259-263Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission actively lobbied medical associations, consumer associations, the press and health agencies outside the U.S. to ban all loose high-powered magnets from being sold. Although such products are back on the market after a period of ban in the U.S., warning labels and age restrictions have become mandatory. Some other countries have prohibited the sale of Buckyballs.3Product Safety AustraliaSmall, high powered magnets banned.https://www.productsafety.gov.au/news/small-high-powered-magnets-bannedGoogle Scholar,4Government of Canada Information for manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers of products containing small, powerful magnets. Date modified: 2013-08-07.https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/consumer-product-safety/advisories-warnings-recalls/letters-notices-information-industry/information-manufacturers-importers-distributors-retailers-products-containing-small-powerful-magnets.htmlGoogle Scholar A twelve-year-old boy was presented 1 h after mis-swallowing Buckyballs after a big dinner. X-ray revealed a chain of nine radio-opaque pellets in his abdomen (Fig. 1A). Given that his stomach was full and that he was asymptomatic, emergent endoscopy was withheld after shared decision making with his parents. X-ray in the next morning revealed these Buckyballs in a ring (Fig. 1B). Gastroendoscopy failed to remove them because the Buckyballs had moved pass the second portion of the duodenum. He remained asymptomatic and the Buckyballs continuously showed signs of movement on every follow-up X-ray (Fig. 1C, D). No foreign body was found on by X-ray two days after the ingestion (Fig. 1E). In cases of magnets ingestion, pressure necrosis will occur if any part of the gastrointestinal tract is entrapped between magnets or a magnet and another co-ingested ferromagnetic object. Early diagnosis is difficult because symptoms and signs vary from asymptomatic, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain to features that suggest bowel obstruction or peritonitis. Although the history of magnet ingestion is suggestive, such incidents are frequently not witnessed and teenagers may withhold information about the ingestion.1De Roo A.C. Thompson M.C. Chounthirath T. Xiang H. Cowles N.A. Shmuylovskaya L. et al.Rare-earth magnet ingestion-related injuries among children, 2000-2012.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013; 52: 1006-1013Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar,2Hodges N.L. Denny S.A. Smith G.A. Rare-earth magnet ingestion-related injuries in the pediatric population: a review.Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015; 11: 259-263Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar Consequently, delays in diagnosis can increase the likelihood of complications such as bowel perforation, peritonitis, volvulus, enteric fistula, or even death. In a study by De Roo et al.,1De Roo A.C. Thompson M.C. Chounthirath T. Xiang H. Cowles N.A. Shmuylovskaya L. et al.Rare-earth magnet ingestion-related injuries among children, 2000-2012.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013; 52: 1006-1013Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar surgery was required in 69.7% of cases where treatment was reported. Therefore, endoscopic removal must be done as early as possible when ingested magnets are within reach. Prevention of rare-earth magnet ingestion is paramount, since serious injuries may occur in patients without timely recognition and intervention. Apart from warning labels, restriction of sale and advocacy to physician, parents, caregivers, and teenagers should be enforced, so as to create awareness about the unique risks posed by ingestion of magnets. As with the parents of our case, they clearly stated that they had known the risks in advance, and they would have not purchased the Buckyballs. None to be declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it