MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137556849 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2011.0222

Nowhere is Perfect: French and Francophone Utopias/Dystopias ed. by John West-Sooby

2011· article· en· W3137556849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annabelle M. Rea

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaFrenchColonialismPrisonUtopiaPoliticsThe ImaginaryHistoryArt historyCanadian literatureFrench literatureClassicsSociologyLiteratureArtLawArchaeologyPolitical sciencePsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WEST-SOOBY, JOHN, ed. Nowhere is Perfect: French and Francophone Utopias/Dystopias. Newark: UP of Delaware, 2008. ISBN 978-0-87413-048-5. Pp. 252. $30.00. West-Sooby is not new to utopian studies; in 2006 with his colleague, Jean Fornasiero, he edited an issue of the Australian Journal of French Studies entitled L’Utopie en mouvement. Here, sixteen participants, almost half from the University of Adelaide, including West-Sooby and Fornasiero, and three-fourths from Australian universities, plus one each from France, New Zealand, Great Britain, and the United States, have written, in English or French, on varied topics. In his introduction, West-Sooby surveys all contributions, remarking on the “apparently endless permutations” (9) in the representation of utopias or dystopias. The authors discuss texts ranging from Montesquieu’s De l’esprit des lois (1748) to Gisèle Pineau’s novel, Fleur de barbarie (2005), with an emphasis on the twentieth century. They analyze novels, films, historical phenomena, and political theory. Articles treating crime, incarceration, the colonial system, and the French imaginary stand out. The first, by Jacqueline Dutton, examines the nineteenthcentury penal colony, through historical research and examples drawn from literary texts. When we think of nineteenth-century prison literature, Balzac’s Vautrin and Hugo’s Jean Valjean may come to mind, but the inclusion of the colonial dimension broadens the discussion considerably. Dutton looks at the “success” of the British in Australia and studies the French decision to locate similar institutions , not in Australia as first contemplated, but in New Caledonia and Guyana. Dominique Kalifa treats a later period (1890 to World War II), with an examination of the military “Biribi,” defined as “un nom donné aux structures punitives et pénitentiaires de l’armée française en Afrique du Nord” (44). To create a context for this complex web of “punitive structures,” Kalifa details the role of antimilitarism , conscription, journalistic investigation, and popular culture’s fascination with the underbelly of society (see FR 83.3, 706). William Jennings’s article on Gide might be linked to these two, through its analysis of Gide’s representation of family as prison, here with a “Foucauldian perspective” (141). Similarly, two essays on Antillean literature, with their point of departure as the “colonial island prison,” could be incorporated into such a thematic cluster. The first, by Peter Poiana, treats Patrick Chamoiseau’s and Edouard Glissant’s transformation of that “island prison” into a “model of cultural dynamism and invention” (168). The second, by Bonnie Thomas, looks at the optimism of Gisèle Pineau, a psychiatric nurse, in her “‘third way’ around the paralyzing effects of a painful past and their psychological and physical consequences on successive generations” (187–88). To speak only of these, however, is to neglect studies of the effect of Fourier’s ideas on Baudelaire, Banville, and Gautier; the “mécène de l’utopie” in THE FRENCH REVIEW, Vol. 84, No. 3, February 2011 Printed in U.S.A. REVIEWS Literary History and Criticism edited by Marion Geiger 580 Paul Adam and Zola; the reception of Romain Gary’s work; the “deux arts de guérir” (213) in Hervé Guibert’s Le Protocole compassionnel; the “construction of a hybrid identity” (241) in several Beur texts; or the Vichy propagandist Philippe Henriot. Nor can we consider two interesting texts on cinema, one on Jacques Tati’s Playtime in dialogue with utopian architecture, the other on two films by Philippe Grandrieux. Unfortunately, bibliographical information must be extracted from the notes following the individual essays. The absence of a bibliography may be attributable to cost-cutting, understandable in difficult times. Nonetheless, the carefully-edited volume is well worth consulting and deserves space on library shelves. Occidental College (CA) Annabelle M. Rea PABAN, GABRIELLE DE. Le Nègre et la créole, ou Mémoires d’Eulalie D***. Ed. Marshall C. Olds. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2008. ISBN 978-2-296-07037-0. Pp. xl + 236. 25 a. Originally published in 1825, Gabrielle de Paban’s story details the life of Eulalie D***, a member of a French colonist’s family in Saint Domingue (Haiti) who, as a 5-year old, is separated from her father on the family...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207