MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3137763212 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p745

Abstract P745: Whole Blood MicroRNA and Their Target Messenger RNA Reveal Distinct Transcriptional Changes in Ischemic Stroke Patients With and Without Comorbid Cancer

2021· article· en· W3137763212 on OpenAlexaff
Babak B. Navi, Carla Sherman, Natalie M. LeMoss, Kelsey N. Lansdale, Hooman Kamel, Scott T. Tagawa, Ashish Saxena, Allyson J. Ocean, Costantino Iadecola, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Mitchell S.V. Elkind, Bodie Knepp, Heather Hull, Glen C. Jickling, Frank R. Sharp, Bradley P. Ander, Boryana Stamova

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)microRNACancerInternal medicineOncologyBioinformaticsGeneBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: One-tenth of patients with stroke have cancer. We previously identified mRNA profiles differentiating patients with stroke and cancer, stroke only, and cancer only. In this study, we investigated mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) transcriptomes to identify potential miRNA regulators that underlie the observed mRNA changes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 4 groups of subjects at 3 centers from 2009-2020. This analysis included 41 subjects with ischemic stroke plus cancer, 42 subjects with ischemic stroke only, 28 subjects with cancer only, and 30 vascular risk factor controls. Stroke-only and cancer-only subjects were matched to stroke-plus-cancer subjects by age, sex, and cancer type. We performed miRNA and mRNA sequencing on blood drawn 72-120 hours after stroke. ANCOVA estimated differential expression of miRNA and mRNA between groups (FDR p<0.05, |fold-change|>1.2). Analyses were adjusted for time from stroke onset, sex, age, vascular risk factors and batch. Results: We identified differential expression in 36 miRNA and 264 corresponding mRNA targets between the stroke-plus-cancer and stroke-only groups after accounting for cancer-only expression (Fig 1). Immune and coagulation pathways, including complement, platelet glycoproteins, TGF-β, and mTOR signaling, were overrepresented in stroke-plus-cancer vs stroke-only subjects. T cell, B cell and platelet precursor-specific genes were also overrepresented in stroke-plus-cancer subjects. When compared to other groups, stroke-plus-cancer subjects had 230 unique mRNA encoding for transcriptional regulators, including those involving splicing, epigenetics, and mediator complex genes bridging transcription factors and RNA transcriptional machinery. Conclusion: Patients with stroke and cancer had distinct signatures of miRNA and target mRNA compared to stroke patients without cancer, supporting the hypothesis that cancer-related stroke is a unique subgroup of ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→