MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artifacts Reduction GAN For Enhancing Quality Of Compressed Panoramic Video

2020· article· en· W3137806071 on OpenAlexaff
Xueshu Wang, Xiaojun Jing, Hai Huang, Yuanhao Cui, Michel Kadoch, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionCoding (social sciences)Video qualityGenerative adversarial networkConvolutional neural networkVisualizationPerceptionDeep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Panoramic video has the characteristics of high resolution, massive information and high sense of immersion, bringing unprecedented visual sensory enjoyment to us. However, considering the limited capacity of current cellular network, videos transmitted to users are often encoded, e.g. by High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), resulting in block artifact problems that significantly affects the visual quality. Thus, it is necessary to enhance the quality of compressed panoramic videos. Inspired by the convolutional networks (CNN) and generative adversarial networks (GAN), the paper proposes a deep GAN model -Artifacts Reduction GAN (ARGAN) which is able to enhance the quality of compressed panoramic videos. ARGAN has the ability of reducing artifacts caused by HEVC. Meanwhile, it can increase the visual realistic of the enhanced videos. We tested the performance of our model under PSNR, SSIM and Perception Index. Qualitative results are also provided to display the visual effects of ARGAN. Experimental results show that our method is superior to other quality enhancement methods in both qualitative and quantitative aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207