Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective : The aim of this study is to check for physical disabled people the result of occupational therapeutic intervention provided by a housing improvement plan of a team, which is composed of experts from both fields of occupational therapy and interior design.Methods : The subjects of this study are a 46 year old man with Buerger’s disease and a 37 year old woman with cerebral palsy. By providing each of home checklist subjects suggested improvement plan taking into consideration characteristics and prognoses of diseases with an environment, and evaluates each patient’s A.D.L by M.B.I. and Occupational performance by Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement.Results : After housing improvement, the subjects showed that ADL was improvement but not meaningful statistics, occupational performance and satisfaction was meaningful clinical changes.Conclusion : This study of team-approach housing improvement, this dissertation shows the fact that a professional management provided by each expert for physical disabled people in community makes possible their comfortable daily lives overcoming disabilities, prevention of diseases, and improvement of life quality. However, a more objective evaluation is needed because housing improvement is an activity of intervention designed according to each subject’s characteristics and situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".