Probabilistic Multi-View Fusion of Active Stereo Depth Maps for Robotic Bin-Picking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reliable fusion of depth maps from multiple viewpoints has become an important problem in many 3D reconstruction pipelines. In this work, we investigate its impact on robotic bin-picking tasks such as 6D object pose estimation. The performance of object pose estimation relies heavily on the quality of depth data. However, due to the prevalence of shiny surfaces and cluttered scenes, industrial grade depth cameras often fail to sense depth or generate unreliable measurements from a single viewpoint. To this end, we propose a novel probabilistic framework for scene reconstruction in robotic bin-picking. Based on active stereo camera data, we first explicitly estimate the uncertainty of depth measurements for mitigating the adverse effects of both noise and outliers. The uncertainty estimates are then incorporated into a probabilistic model for incrementally updating the scene. To extensively evaluate the traditional fusion approach alongside our own approach, we will release a novel representative dataset with multiple views for each bin and curated parts. Over the entire dataset, we demonstrate that our framework outperforms a traditional fusion approach by a 12.8% reduction in reconstruction error, and 6.1% improvement in detection rate. The dataset will be available at https://www.trailab.utias.utoronto.ca/robi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it