Cooperation and Mutual Assistance: The Search for Fundamentals of Building of New Social Relationships (Political and Legal Views of P.A. Kropotkin, Theorist of Russian Anarchism of the Last Quarter of the XIX to the Early XX Century)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the institution of cooperation in the teachings of P.A. Kropotkin, who transferred its basic political and legal principles of the device to the concept of anarchism he was developing. Based on the provisions of social reconstruction, put forward by R. Owen, Petr Alekseevich adapted his ideas for his own theory, with its inherent positive and negative features. Kropotkin did not have separate works devoted to cooperation, but he did his best to draw attention to the importance of this institution in rebuilding society on anarchist principles. The basis of cooperation, according to Petr Alekseevich, was customary law, developed by society itself, without state intervention. The result of the study was that the self-government of communes in Kropotkin’s theory of anarchism was based on the principles of the institution of cooperation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it